The Idol of Tolerance: How "Nice" Christianity Became Heresy by Jeff Callaway

The Idol of Tolerance: How "Nice" Christianity Became Heresy

By Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

I. The Gospel That No Longer Disturbs

Walk into any church on any given Sunday and you'll find them filled with people who smile, sing, and leave unchanged. The sermons are polished, the music is professional, and nobody walks out convicted. We've traded the Cross for comfort, repentance for reassurance, and the narrow gate for a wide welcome mat that leads straight to Hell.

Modern Christianity has committed the ultimate betrayal. It has replaced truth with tolerance, charity with niceness, and love with approval. This is not a harmless drift or an innocent misunderstanding. This is doctrinal collapse. This is moral cowardice dressed up in religious language. This is the very definition of apostasy.

The Church was supposed to be a hospital for sinners, not a country club for the comfortable. It was meant to be an army on the march, not a spa for the spiritually satisfied. But somewhere along the way, we stopped preaching a Gospel that disturbs and started peddling a religion that merely affirms. We stopped warning sinners about Hell and started assuring them that God is too loving to send anyone there. We stopped calling men to repentance and started celebrating their lifestyle choices.

What the world calls compassion, Scripture often calls cowardice. What the culture demands as tolerance, the Catechism condemns as idolatry. And what modern preachers market as love is often nothing more than the cruel silence of those who won't warn their neighbors that the house is on fire.

The truth is this: a Christianity that never offends is a Christianity that never saves. A Jesus who never challenges sin is not the Jesus of Scripture. He is a false Christ, an idol carved from the wood of human sentiment and painted with the gloss of cultural acceptability. And like all idols, he demands sacrifice. The sacrifice he demands is truth itself.

II. Defining the Idol: What Modern "Tolerance" Really Means

We need to be clear about what we're dealing with here. The tolerance being preached from pulpits and practiced in pews today is not the classical Christian virtue of patience with error. It's something far more dangerous.

Classical Christian tolerance meant enduring what is wrong without endorsing it. It meant loving the sinner while rejecting the sin. It meant bearing with the weaknesses of others while still upholding the truth. As the Catechism teaches, charity demands both beneficence and fraternal correction. Real love wills the good of the other, not merely their comfort.

But modern tolerance has become something else entirely. It has become moral relativism baptized in religious sentiment. It is the belief that truth itself is violence, that to name sin is to hate the sinner, and that the highest virtue is never to offend anyone with anything that sounds like judgment. Modern tolerance demands not merely that we coexist with sin, but that we celebrate it, affirm it, and call it good.

This new tolerance functions exactly like the golden calves of old. Consider what the Catechism says about idolatry: it consists in divinizing what is not God, in honoring and revering a creature in place of God. Tolerance has become that creature. It demands sacrifice—the sacrifice of truth, conscience, and doctrine. It punishes dissenters with social exile and public shaming. It promises peace but delivers only confusion and spiritual death.

The Catechism is crystal clear: idolatry rejects the unique Lordship of God and is therefore incompatible with communion with Him. When tolerance becomes absolute, when it becomes the supreme value to which all other values must bow, it stops being a virtue and becomes a false god. And like all false gods, it makes its worshippers empty.

The real question is not whether we should tolerate error—of course we should be patient with those who are struggling, those who are ignorant, those who are weak. The question is whether we will endorse error, whether we will call evil good and good evil, whether we will sacrifice truth on the altar of niceness. And on that question, Scripture leaves no room for compromise.

III. The Biblical Christ vs. the "Nice Jesus"

The Jesus being preached in most churches today bears little resemblance to the Christ of Scripture. The real Jesus—the one who walked the dusty roads of Galilee, who confronted the Pharisees, who cleansed the Temple with a whip—this Jesus has been replaced by a counterfeit so thoroughly domesticated that He would not recognize Himself.

The real Christ came not to bring peace but a sword. Those are His words, not mine. In Matthew 10:34-39, Jesus tells His disciples plainly that following Him will divide families, pit children against parents, and make a man's enemies those of his own household. This is not the language of a motivational speaker or a life coach. This is the language of a King who demands absolute allegiance.

The real Jesus is a divider, not a peacekeeper. He is the Judge and Savior, not a moral negotiator. He is Truth incarnate, and truth by its very nature excludes error. When Christ says "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me," He is not offering one option among many. He is declaring Himself the only way, and all other ways lead to destruction.

The real Jesus spoke more about Hell than anyone else in Scripture. He warned about Gehenna, about the unquenchable fire, about the place where both soul and body can be destroyed. In Matthew 5:29-30, He says it would be better to enter life maimed than to have your whole body cast into Hell. In Matthew 25, He describes the final judgment where the sheep are separated from the goats, and the goats are sent away into eternal punishment. These are hard sayings. They are meant to be.

The real Jesus confronted sin directly and personally. To the woman caught in adultery, He showed mercy—but His mercy did not end with acceptance. It ended with a command: "Go and sin no more." To the rich young ruler, He offered eternal life—but only at the cost of everything the man held dear. To the Pharisees, He offered no soft words at all, calling them whitewashed tombs, blind guides, and children of Hell.

But the fabricated "Nice Jesus" bears none of these qualities. The Nice Jesus never confronts. He never warns. He never offends. He exists to affirm lifestyles, not to transform souls. He smiles benignly at sin and nods approvingly at every choice we make. He requires no repentance because He sees nothing to repent of. He demands no obedience because He has no commands. He promises heaven without holiness, salvation without sacrifice, and the crown without the cross.

This Jesus is attractive precisely because He is safe. He will never challenge us, never call us to account, never demand that we die to ourselves. He will never tell us that our way leads to destruction. He will never weep over our sins or warn us about judgment. He is, in short, exactly the god we would create if we were making one in our own image.

But here is the truth that must be spoken: a Jesus who never challenges sin is not merciful. He is fictional. A Christ who affirms everyone and confronts no one is not the Savior. He is an idol. And those who preach this false Christ are not ministers of the Gospel. They are merchants of deception, leading souls not to salvation but to damnation.

IV. False Compassion: When Mercy Is Severed from Truth

The Catechism defines charity as the theological virtue by which we love God above all things for His own sake, and our neighbor as ourselves for the love of God. Real charity, real love, wills the good of the other. Not their comfort. Not their temporary happiness. Their good—their eternal good, their salvation, their transformation into the likeness of Christ.

This means that authentic Christian love sometimes wounds. It admonishes. It corrects. It speaks uncomfortable truths. The Catechism lists the spiritual works of mercy, and right there among them is this: to admonish the sinner. Not to condemn them. Not to shame them. But to warn them, to call them back from the edge of the cliff, to love them enough to risk their anger and our reputation in order to tell them the truth.

The prophet Ezekiel understood this. God made him a watchman for the house of Israel and told him that if he saw the sword coming and did not blow the trumpet to warn the people, their blood would be on his hands. The watchman's job is not to control whether people listen. His job is to sound the alarm. If he stays silent, he becomes complicit in their destruction.

This is the duty of every Christian, but especially of those who shepherd God's flock. We are our brother's keepers. When we see someone walking toward destruction—whether it's through mortal sin, false doctrine, or simple spiritual complacency—we have an obligation to speak. Not out of superiority or self-righteousness, but out of love. Because silence in the face of mortal sin is not neutrality. It is participation.

But the modern Church has convinced itself that saying anything is judging, and judging is the one unforgivable sin. We have redefined "judgment" to mean any form of moral discernment, any suggestion that one way is right and another is wrong. We have bought the lie that says "It's not my place to say anything" or "Who am I to judge?" And in buying that lie, we have abandoned our posts as watchmen. We have let souls walk into Hell rather than risk being called intolerant.

This is not compassion. This is cruelty dressed up in religious language. It is the cruelty of the doctor who sees the cancer but says nothing because he doesn't want to alarm the patient. It is the cruelty of the lifeguard who watches someone drown because he doesn't want to make a scene. It is the cruelty of the priest who lets souls perish rather than preach the hard truths that might save them.

Real compassion tells the truth. Real mercy calls sin what it is. Real love warns the beloved about danger, even when—especially when—that warning is unwelcome. To do anything less is not kindness. It is betrayal.

V. Hell, Sin, and the Teachings We're No Longer Allowed to Mention

The doctrine of Hell has all but vanished from modern preaching. When was the last time you heard a sermon on eternal punishment? When was the last time a priest or pastor stood in the pulpit and told his congregation plainly that there is a Hell, that it is eternal, and that people go there?

Yet Christ spoke of Hell more than anyone else in Scripture. He described it as a place of outer darkness where there is weeping and gnashing of teeth. He called it Gehenna, the unquenchable fire. He made it clear that the road to destruction is wide and many travel it, while the road to life is narrow and few find it.

The Catechism is equally clear. We cannot be united with God unless we freely choose to love Him. But we cannot love God if we sin gravely against Him, against our neighbor, or against ourselves. To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God's merciful love means remaining separated from Him forever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called Hell.

God predestines no one to Hell. The teaching is explicit. For someone to go to Hell, a willful turning away from God—what the Church calls mortal sin—is necessary, and persistence in that sin until the end. But the possibility is real. The danger is urgent. And the silence of the modern Church on this matter is a scandal of cosmic proportions.

Why was Hell preached historically? Not to terrorize people, but to awaken their consciences. Not to drive them away from God, but to drive them to Him. The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and part of that fear is the understanding that our choices have eternal consequences, that sin really does lead to death, and that there is a point of no return.

But we have stopped preaching Hell because we have stopped believing in mortal sin. We have adopted a therapeutic view of human nature that sees all wrongdoing as either psychological illness or social conditioning. We have embraced a sentimentalism that cannot imagine a loving God allowing anyone to suffer eternally. We have, in short, rejected the clear teaching of Scripture and Tradition in favor of a more comfortable gospel of our own making.

The consequence of this silence is devastating. Confession has been abandoned because if there is no serious sin, there is nothing serious to confess. The Eucharist has been trivialized because if everyone is basically good, everyone can receive. Salvation has been presumed because if there is no Hell, there is nothing to be saved from. The entire edifice of Christian life collapses when we remove the foundation of sin, judgment, and accountability.

VI. How the Church Lost Her Voice

The Church has always existed in tension with the world. Christ promised it would be so: "If the world hates you, know that it hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you." Yet modern Christianity has become desperate for the world's approval.

We fear being labeled judgmental, intolerant, hateful, or unloving. We fear being mocked, marginalized, or rejected. We fear that if we speak the truth plainly, people will leave the Church, donations will dry up, and our influence will wane. So we soften the message. We emphasize love and mercy while remaining silent about sin and judgment. We preach a Gospel with all the comfort of Christianity but none of its challenge.

This is the fear of man, and Scripture condemns it unequivocally. St. Paul asks, "Am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ." We cannot serve two masters. We cannot seek both the approval of the world and the approval of God. And when we try, we end up serving neither.

But the problem runs deeper than mere cowardice. It extends to those who should be guarding the flock. The prophet Ezekiel pronounces woe on the shepherds of Israel who feed themselves but do not feed the sheep, who do not strengthen the weak or heal the sick or bind up the injured or bring back the strayed or seek the lost. These false shepherds have failed in their pastoral responsibility, and the sheep are scattered because of it.

The same thing is happening today. Too many clergy have stopped guarding the truth. They have stopped warning about sin. They have stopped teaching the hard doctrines of the faith. Instead, they offer a steady diet of therapeutic encouragement, feel-good messages, and vague platitudes about being nice to each other. They have become motivational speakers rather than prophets, life coaches rather than priests.

The cost of this silence is incalculable. Scandal spreads unchecked. Confusion reigns. False doctrines flourish. And souls are lost—not because no one could have warned them, but because those charged with warning them chose popularity over truth, peace over principle, and the approval of men over the commands of God.

VII. Tolerance vs. Truth: An Irreconcilable Conflict

Truth and relativism cannot coexist. This is not a matter of opinion or preference. It is a matter of logical necessity. Truth, by its very nature, excludes error. To say that something is true means that its opposite is false. There is no middle ground, no compromise position, no way to affirm both truth and its denial.

Christ did not offer many paths to salvation. He offered one: Himself. He did not suggest that sincere people of all faiths are basically heading in the same direction. He said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." This is not arrogance. It is reality. And Christianity that denies this reality has ceased to be Christianity at all.

Moral relativism is the anti-Gospel. It says there is no objective truth, no universal standard of right and wrong, no final authority to which we must answer. It reduces all moral claims to matters of personal preference or cultural conditioning. It makes each person their own god, their own lawgiver, their own judge.

But Christianity proclaims that there is a God, that He has spoken, that He has revealed truth, and that we will be judged by that truth whether we acknowledge it or not. Christianity proclaims that sin is real, that righteousness matters, and that our choices have eternal consequences. To compromise on these truths is not to be merciful or tolerant. It is to be faithless.

The Church cannot make peace with moral relativism without ceasing to be the Church. We cannot embrace the values of tolerance and affirmation that the culture demands without betraying the Gospel we were commissioned to preach. The choice is stark and unavoidable: truth or tolerance, Christ or culture, the narrow way or the broad road.

VIII. The Saints Were Not "Nice"

If you want to know what authentic Christianity looks like, look at the saints. Not the domesticated versions we paint on holy cards, but the real men and women who turned the world upside down for Christ.

John the Baptist was not nice. He stood in the wilderness wearing camel hair and eating locusts, calling the religious leaders a brood of vipers and demanding repentance. He confronted King Herod's adultery to his face and was beheaded for his trouble. But Jesus said there was no one born of woman greater than John.

St. Athanasius was not nice. He stood against the entire world when it seemed the whole Church had embraced the Arian heresy. He was exiled five times, vilified, hunted, and condemned. But he never wavered in his defense of the truth that Christ is fully God. The saying went, "Athanasius contra mundum"—Athanasius against the world. And Athanasius won.

St. Catherine of Siena was not nice. She rebuked popes, confronted cardinals, and called corrupt clergy to repentance with a boldness that would scandalize most modern Christians. She spoke truth to power without apology and without fear. Her words cut like a sword, but they cut in love, always aimed at salvation, never at destruction.

St. Maximilian Kolbe was not nice. He founded a movement dedicated to total consecration to Mary and evangelization of the world. He stood up to the Nazis, was arrested and sent to Auschwitz, and there volunteered to die in place of another man. His last act was one of supreme sacrifice, but his whole life was an act of uncompromising witness to the truth.

What these saints shared was love without compromise, courage without apology, and obedience to God over the approval of men. They were not concerned with being liked or accepted or tolerated. They were concerned with being faithful. They understood that the Gospel is not a suggestion to be considered but a truth to be proclaimed, a call to be answered, and a cross to be carried.

The modern expectation is that Christians should be perpetually nice, endlessly affirming, and never confrontational. But this expectation is neither biblical nor historical. It is a product of our therapeutic culture that values feelings over truth and comfort over conviction. And it is killing the Church.

IX. The Cost of Truth: What Faithfulness Actually Requires

Let us be honest about what following Christ will cost. It will cost relationships. When you refuse to affirm sin, even in those you love, you will be rejected. When you stand for truth in a world that calls truth hate speech, you will be vilified. When you choose Christ over culture, you will be excluded, mocked, and possibly persecuted.

Jesus promised this. He said, "Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you." The blessing comes through suffering. The reward comes through sacrifice. There is no crown without a cross.

The world will call you judgmental when you speak truth. The culture will call you hateful when you refuse to celebrate sin. Even other Christians will call you unloving when you insist on biblical standards. You will be misunderstood, misrepresented, and maligned. This is the price of discipleship.

But Christ never promised it would be easy. He promised it would be worth it. He promised that those who lose their life for His sake will find it. He promised that those who endure to the end will be saved. He promised that those who confess Him before men, He will confess before His Father in heaven.

The cross is not optional. It is the very heart of Christian life. We cannot follow a crucified Savior by walking a comfortable path. We cannot preach a Gospel of repentance without calling people to turn from their sins. We cannot love others truly without telling them the truth, even when the truth is hard.

X. A Call to Repentance: From Niceness Back to Holiness

The question each of us must answer is this: Where have we stayed silent when we should have spoken? Where have we confused love with approval, tolerance with truth, mercy with permissiveness? Where have we feared man more than God?

It is time for the Church—all of us who claim the name of Christ—to repent. To turn away from the idol of tolerance and back to the worship of Truth. To stop seeking the approval of the world and start seeking the approval of God. To preach once again the full Gospel—not just the parts that comfort, but the parts that convict. Not just the promises of mercy, but the warnings of judgment. Not just the love of God, but the holiness He demands.

Faithful Christianity looks like this: It speaks truth with humility and courage, recognizing our own sinfulness even as we call others to repentance. It loves sinners enough to risk offense, understanding that the most unloving thing we can do is to affirm them in their sins. It returns to the practices that form us in holiness—regular confession, serious study of Scripture and the Catechism, reverent participation in the sacraments, and moral clarity about right and wrong.

We must recover the spiritual works of mercy that have been abandoned. We must learn again how to admonish sinners, instruct the ignorant, counsel the doubtful, and bear wrongs patiently. We must stop being shaped by the culture and start shaping the culture. We must become, once again, salt and light—salt that preserves and stings, light that reveals and exposes.

This will not be popular. It will not win us friends or influence. But it is what Christ commands. And if we love Him, we will keep His commandments.

XI. The Church Does Not Need to Be Nice

The Church was never meant to be safe. It was meant to be holy. The Gospel was never meant to blend in. It was meant to stand out, to confront, to challenge, to transform. Christianity that does not disturb the comfortable is Christianity that does not save souls.

We do not need a nicer Church. We need a holier one. We do not need softer preaching. We need sharper truth. We do not need more tolerance. We need more love—the kind of love that tells the truth, bears the cross, and leads souls to heaven even at the cost of earthly comfort.

Truth stands bloodied but unbowed. It always has. It always will. The world crucified it once, and the world tries to silence it still. But truth cannot be killed. It rises again. And those who stand with truth, who speak truth, who live truth—these will share in the resurrection.

Christ still asks the question He asked His disciples: "Who do you say that I am?" How we answer determines everything. If we say He is a nice teacher, a moral example, a spiritual guide among many, then we have made Him in our image and worshiped an idol. But if we say He is the Christ, the Son of the living God, the only name by which we must be saved—then we must follow Him wherever He leads, whatever it costs, however offensive that truth may be to a world that has rejected Him.

The idol of tolerance must be torn down. The false Christ of niceness must be rejected. And the real Jesus—the Jesus who came not to bring peace but a sword, who demands all and promises everything, who leads through the narrow gate to life everlasting—this Jesus must be preached again with fire and conviction and truth.

The Church does not need the world's approval. It needs God's anointing. It does not need cultural acceptance. It needs spiritual power. It does not need to be nice. It needs to be holy.

May God give us the courage to be faithful. May He give us the wisdom to speak truth. May He give us the love to do both with humility and grace. And may we never, ever sacrifice truth on the altar of tolerance again.

~ Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

© 2025 Texas Outlaw Press. All rights reserved.

https://texasoutlawpress.org