The Real Presence or Empty Symbol: What You Believe About Communion Matters Eternally by Jeff Callaway

The Real Presence or Empty Symbol: What You Believe About Communion Matters Eternally

By Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

Listen closely now. What I'm about to lay before you ain't no academic exercise. This here's about your eternal soul and where it's headed when your heart takes its last beat.

Picture this: A priest standing at the altar, trembling hands holding bread and wine. Ancient words echo through the sanctuary, the same words that fell from Christ's lips the night before He died. "This is My Body. This is My Blood."

Now here's the question that'll separate the wheat from the chaff: Is that priest holding Christ Himself, body and blood, soul and divinity? Or is he just holding religious props for a nice ceremony?

Your answer to that question ain't theological hair-splitting. It's the difference between encountering the Living God and playing church.

The Battle Line Drawn in Blood and Wine

We got ourselves two camps in Christianity today. On one side stands the ancient faith—Catholic and Orthodox—holding fast to what Christians have believed for two thousand years: Christ is truly, really, substantially present in the Eucharist. On the other side, you got modern Protestantism, mostly treating Communion like a symbol, a memorial, a nice reminder of something Jesus did a long time ago.

One of these positions is right. The other one's deadly wrong.

And I ain't being dramatic. This is about whether you're receiving the Bread of Life that Jesus promised would give you eternal life, or whether you're just munching crackers and sipping grape juice while thinking holy thoughts.

Jesus Didn't Mince Words

Let's go straight to the source. John chapter 6, the Bread of Life Discourse. Jesus just fed five thousand people with a few loaves and fish. The crowd follows Him, looking for more free food. But Jesus ain't interested in filling their bellies again. He's after their souls.

He tells them straight: "I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world."

Now watch what happens. The Jews start arguing among themselves: "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?"

If you're a good teacher and your students misunderstand you, what do you do? You clarify. You say, "Hold on now, y'all got it wrong. I'm speaking metaphorically here."

But Jesus don't do that. Instead, He doubles down. He intensifies His language. He switches from the Greek word "phago" (to eat) to "trogo" (to gnaw, to chew like an animal eats).

"Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you."

Read that again. No life in you. Not less life. Not diminished life. NO LIFE.

He ain't backing down. He ain't softening His message. He's making it clearer and harder to swallow—if you'll pardon the expression. Many of His own disciples walk away at this point. They say, "This saying is hard; who can accept it?"

And Jesus? He turns to the Twelve and asks, "Do you also want to leave?"

If there ever was a time for Jesus to say, "Wait, y'all, I was just being symbolic," this was it. But He don't. He lets them walk. Because He meant what He said.

Peter gets it, even if he don't fully understand it: "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life."

The Last Supper: No Room for Metaphor

Fast forward to the Last Supper. Jesus takes bread, blesses it, breaks it, and says, "This is my body, which is given for you."

Then He takes the cup: "This cup that is poured out for you is the new covenant in my blood."

Notice what Jesus didn't say. He didn't say, "This represents my body." He didn't say, "This symbolizes my blood." He said "IS." Present tense. Declarative. Final.

The Apostle Paul understood what this meant. Writing to the Corinthians, he delivers a warning that makes no sense if the Eucharist is just a symbol:

"Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself."

Read that careful now. Paul's saying if you receive Communion unworthily, you're guilty of sinning against Christ's actual body and blood. You bring judgment on yourself. Some of the Corinthians were even getting sick and dying because of how they approached the Eucharist.

You don't bring divine judgment on yourself for mishandling a symbol. You bring judgment for dishonoring the real presence of the Living God.

What the Catholic Church Teaches

The Catechism of the Catholic Church don't beat around the bush. Paragraph 1374 states it plain: "The mode of Christ's presence under the Eucharistic species is unique. It raises the Eucharist above all the sacraments as 'the perfection of the spiritual life and the end to which all the sacraments tend.' In the most blessed sacrament of the Eucharist 'the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity, of our Lord Jesus Christ and, therefore, the whole Christ is truly, really, and substantially contained.'"

The whole Christ. Not part of Him. Not His spirit only. The whole package—body, blood, soul, and divinity. All of Jesus, present under the appearance of bread and wine.

The Church calls this transubstantiation. At the consecration, the substance of bread and wine is transformed into the substance of Christ's body and blood. The appearances remain—it still looks, tastes, feels like bread and wine—but the reality underneath has changed completely.

This ain't magic. This is God doing what only God can do: transforming creation at the deepest level while leaving the surface unchanged. Same creative power that spoke the universe into existence. Same power that raised Jesus from the dead. Same power that'll raise your body on the last day if you eat this Bread.

The Catechism goes on to say in paragraph 1324 that the Eucharist is "the source and summit of the Christian life." Everything in the Church flows from the Eucharist and leads back to it. You want to understand Catholicism? Start here. This is the beating heart of the whole thing.

The Witness of the Early Church

Now some folks might say, "That's just Catholic doctrine. Where's the proof this is what Christians always believed?"

I'm glad you asked. Let's talk about what the earliest Christians wrote when the apostles' ink was barely dry.

Ignatius of Antioch (110 AD)

Ignatius was a disciple of the Apostle John himself. He learned the faith from the guys who walked with Jesus. When he's being hauled off to Rome to be thrown to the lions, he writes letters to various churches. In his letter to the Smyrnaeans, he writes:

"They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which the Father, in his goodness, raised up again."

Ignatius is talking about heretics here—people who denied that Jesus really came in the flesh. And what's their tell-tale sign? They won't receive Communion because they don't believe it's actually Christ's flesh.

If the Eucharist was just a symbol, why would denying the Real Presence be a marker of heresy? Ignatius also called the Eucharist the "medicine of immortality." You don't call a symbol medicine. You call actual healing power medicine.

Justin Martyr (150 AD)

Justin Martyr wrote to the Roman Emperor, explaining what Christians believe and do. In his First Apology, chapter 66, he writes:

"Not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh."

Justin's saying it plain: Just as Jesus took on real flesh and blood for our salvation, the Eucharist is His real flesh and blood. Not common bread. Not common drink. The flesh and blood of Jesus.

Irenaeus of Lyon (180 AD)

Irenaeus fought against the Gnostics, heretics who denied the goodness of physical creation. In his work "Against Heresies," he uses the Eucharist as proof that God cares about physical matter:

"If the Lord were from other than the Father, how could he rightly take bread, which is of the same creation as our own, and confess it to be his body and affirm that the mixture in the cup is his blood?"

Irenaeus is asking: How could Jesus take ordinary bread and declare it His body if He wasn't really making it His body? The whole argument depends on the Real Presence being real.

The Universal Consensus

You can read Cyril of Jerusalem, Augustine of Hippo, Theodore of Mopsuestia, and every other Church Father from the first centuries. They all taught the Real Presence. Sure, they used different words and explanations. They didn't have the technical term "transubstantiation" yet. But the belief? Universal. Unanimous. Unquestioned.

The first recorded challenge to the Real Presence in the Western Church came in the 11th century with Berengarius of Tours. And what happened? The Church condemned him as a heretic. Because this wasn't a new teaching being added—this was the ancient faith being denied.

The Protestant Reformation: When the Wheels Came Off

For over a thousand years, all of Christianity believed in the Real Presence. Then came the Protestant Reformation.

Martin Luther—give him credit—kept believing in the Real Presence. He rejected the Catholic explanation of how it worked (transubstantiation), but he firmly believed Christ's body and blood were really present "in, with, and under" the bread and wine.

But Luther had a problem. Once you throw out the authority of the Church and make every man his own pope with a Bible in his hand, you got no way to settle disputes. And sure enough, other Reformers took things further than Luther wanted.

Huldrych Zwingli: The Symbolic View

Zwingli, the Swiss Reformer, went whole hog in the other direction. He said the Eucharist was purely symbolic. Just a memorial. A reminder of what Jesus did. When Jesus said "This is my body," Zwingli claimed He meant "This represents my body" or "This signifies my body."

Zwingli and Luther met at the Marburg Colloquy in 1529 to try to settle their differences. They agreed on fourteen points of theology. But on the fifteenth point—the Eucharist—they couldn't find common ground. The meeting ended with both sides in tears, unable to achieve unity.

Luther kept writing the words "Hoc est corpus meum" ("This is my body") on the table. His point was simple: Jesus said "is," not "represents." Why should we change His words?

Zwingli kept pointing to John 6:63, where Jesus says "the flesh is of no avail." But he missed the point entirely. Jesus wasn't saying "My flesh is of no avail." He was saying human understanding—"the flesh" in the sense of natural human thinking—can't grasp this mystery. You need faith. You need the Holy Spirit.

John Calvin: The Middle Ground?

Calvin tried to find middle ground. He rejected transubstantiation like the other Reformers. But he also rejected Zwingli's bare memorialism. Calvin taught a "spiritual presence"—that believers receive Christ spiritually through faith when they take Communion, even though His body remains in heaven.

It's a more sophisticated position than Zwingli's. But it still denies what the Catholic Church has always taught: that Christ's body and blood are substantially present under the appearances of bread and wine.

The Council of Trent Fights Back

In 1545, the Catholic Church convened the Council of Trent to address the chaos of the Reformation. Between 1545 and 1563, the bishops met in multiple sessions to reaffirm Catholic doctrine against Protestant errors.

On October 11, 1551, at the thirteenth session, the Council issued its Decree on the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist. The Council declared:

"Because Christ our Redeemer said that it was truly his body that he was offering under the species of bread, it has always been the conviction of the Church of God, and this holy Council now declares again, that by the consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called transubstantiation."

The Council also issued canons—formal declarations with penalties attached. Canon 1 stated: If anyone denies that the body and blood of Christ are truly, really, and substantially contained in the Eucharist, let him be anathema.

"Anathema" means cut off from the Church. Damned. Because denying the Real Presence ain't a minor theological disagreement. It strikes at the heart of the faith. It denies what Christ promised. It rejects what the apostles taught. It abandons what Christians have always believed.

Why This Matters For Your Soul

Some folks might be reading this and thinking, "Why's this old cowboy getting so worked up about bread and wine? Ain't we all Christians here? Can't we just agree to disagree?"

No. We can't. And here's why.

The Promise of Eternal Life

Jesus tied the Eucharist directly to eternal life. John 6:54: "He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day."

Not "might have." Not "could have." Has. Present tense. Guaranteed.

If the Eucharist is just a symbol, then Jesus was either lying or speaking carelessly about the most important thing in existence—eternal salvation. Neither option is acceptable for the Son of God.

But if the Eucharist really is Christ's body and blood, then receiving Him worthily means receiving eternal life. And rejecting Him—or treating Him like a mere symbol—means rejecting the very means of salvation He gave us.

The Judgment Paul Warned About

Remember what Paul said: eating and drinking unworthily brings judgment. Some were sick. Some had died. This ain't gentle language. This is serious as a heart attack.

The Catholic Church takes this warning seriously. That's why we teach that you must be in a state of grace to receive Communion. That's why we require confession of mortal sins before approaching the altar. That's why we reserve the Eucharist only for Catholics who believe what the Church teaches.

This ain't elitism or exclusionism. This is protecting people from judgment. If Paul's warning is real—and it is—then we'd be doing people a grave disservice by letting them approach the altar casually or in a state of serious sin.

The Sacrificial Nature of the Mass

The Catholic Mass ain't just a community meal. It's the re-presentation of Christ's sacrifice on Calvary. Not a new sacrifice. Not a different sacrifice. The same sacrifice, made present again through the Eucharist.

When you go to Mass, you're standing at the foot of the Cross. You're present at Calvary. The same Jesus who died for your sins is offering Himself to the Father—and offering Himself to you as food for the journey home to heaven.

If you reduce Communion to a symbol, you lose all of this. You're left with a nice ceremony where people think religious thoughts. But you don't have the power of the Cross made present. You don't have Christ offering Himself. You don't have the Bread of Life.

Common Objections Answered

Let me address some of the arguments Protestants make against the Real Presence. I'm going to be respectful but direct, because souls are at stake.

"You Can't Take Jesus Literally"

Some folks say taking Jesus literally in John 6 would make Christians cannibals. But that misses the point entirely. Catholics don't receive Christ in a "cannibalistic" form. We receive Him in the form of bread and wine—sacramentally, not gruesomely.

The substance changes, but the appearances remain. You're not chewing on raw flesh. You're receiving Christ under the sacramental signs He chose to give Himself to us.

The charge of cannibalism also ignores what Jesus Himself said about His flesh being "true food" and His blood being "true drink." He's offering Himself as spiritual nourishment, not as a corpse to be devoured.

"Jesus Used Metaphors"

Yes, Jesus used metaphors. He called Himself a door. He called Himself a vine. Nobody thinks Jesus is made of wood or has leaves growing out of Him.

But here's the difference: When Jesus used metaphors, His audience understood He was speaking figuratively. Nobody asked, "How can this man be a door made of wood?" Nobody asked, "How can this man be a plant?"

But when Jesus said to eat His flesh and drink His blood, His audience was scandalized. They took Him literally, and He didn't correct them. Instead, He intensified His language and let them walk away.

If Jesus was just being metaphorical, He was the worst teacher in history. He let people abandon Him over a misunderstanding He could have cleared up with a few words.

"Transubstantiation Is Too Philosophical"

Some Protestants claim transubstantiation is built on Aristotelian philosophy that wasn't around in Jesus' time, so it can't be true.

But this is backwards. The Church didn't invent the Real Presence to fit a philosophy. The Church used philosophical language to explain a reality Christians already believed.

Christians from the beginning believed that the bread and wine became Christ's body and blood. In the Middle Ages, theologians borrowed terms from Aristotle (substance and accidents) to help explain this mystery. But the belief came first. The explanation came later.

It's like using modern physics to explain how God created the universe. The physics don't create the universe—they just help us understand the creation that already exists.

"Christ's Body Is in Heaven"

Protestants influenced by Zwingli and Calvin argue that Christ's human body is in one place—heaven—and therefore can't be present on earth in the Eucharist.

But this limits God. Christ's glorified body after the Resurrection could pass through locked doors. He could appear and disappear. He ascended into heaven—a physical body going somewhere.

If God can create the universe from nothing, if God can raise the dead, if God can become man in the first place, why can't He make His body present under the appearances of bread and wine?

The Incarnation itself is a mystery—God taking on human flesh. The Real Presence is an extension of that mystery. God continues to come to us in physical, tangible ways because He created us as physical, tangible beings.

Eucharistic Adoration: Worshiping the Real Presence

Because Catholics believe Christ remains truly present in the consecrated host as long as the appearances of bread remain, we do something that seems strange to Protestants: we worship the Eucharist.

We keep the consecrated hosts in a tabernacle—a special, ornate container—in every Catholic church. When we enter the church, we genuflect (kneel briefly) toward the tabernacle, acknowledging Christ's presence.

We expose the Blessed Sacrament for adoration, placing a consecrated host in a monstrance (a sacred vessel designed to display it) so the faithful can pray before the visible presence of Christ.

We carry the Blessed Sacrament in Corpus Christi processions through the streets, publicly honoring Christ present among us.

To Protestants, this looks like idolatry—worshiping bread. But to Catholics, this is logical. If Christ is really present—if that host is truly the body, blood, soul, and divinity of Jesus Christ—then it deserves our worship. It would be idolatry NOT to worship Him.

Jesus said, "Where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I in the midst of them." But in the Eucharist, He's present in a unique way—substantially, not just spiritually. He's there whether we gather or not, whether we acknowledge Him or not.

That's why Catholic churches often have people praying before the tabernacle at all hours. They're not praying to bread. They're spending time with Jesus, who is truly present.

The Eucharist and Salvation

Let me bring this home to what matters most: Are you saved? Where are you going when you die?

The Catholic Church teaches that salvation comes through Jesus Christ alone. No argument there. But how does Christ's saving work reach you? Through the sacraments He instituted, especially the Eucharist.

In John 6, Jesus ties eating His flesh and drinking His blood directly to eternal life. He doesn't say it's one option among many. He says unless you eat and drink, you have NO life in you.

That's strong language. That's all-or-nothing language. That's the language of necessity.

Now, the Catholic Church recognizes that God's grace can work in mysterious ways. Non-Catholics who don't have access to the Eucharist can still be saved through Christ's mercy. God ain't bound by the sacraments He instituted.

But here's the thing: If you've heard the truth about the Eucharist, if you know what the Catholic Church teaches and why, if you understand that this is what Christians believed from the beginning—and you still reject it—what does that mean for your soul?

It means you're rejecting the means of grace Christ Himself gave you. You're saying, "Thanks, Jesus, but I'll take my chances with the symbolic version." You're walking away like those disciples in John 6 who said, "This saying is hard; who can accept it?"

The Call to Return

If you're Protestant and you've read this far, I reckon you're at least curious. Maybe something in your heart is stirring. Maybe the Holy Spirit is working on you.

I'm not asking you to take my word for anything. I'm asking you to do your own research. Read John 6 again, slowly, prayerfully. Read the Church Fathers—Ignatius, Justin, Irenaeus. See what the earliest Christians believed.

Look at the consistent witness of the Church through the centuries. Look at the witness of the saints who literally died rather than deny the Real Presence.

Look at your own heart. When you take Communion in your Protestant church, do you feel like you're encountering the Living God? Or does it feel like a nice ceremony?

I ain't saying feelings are everything. But I am saying that if the Eucharist really is Christ's body and blood, receiving Him should be the most powerful spiritual experience you can have on this side of heaven.

The Catholic Church is here, waiting. We've been here for two thousand years, holding the same truth Jesus gave the apostles. The Eucharist is here, the Bread of Life, the medicine of immortality, the source and summit of the Christian life.

Jesus asked the Twelve, "Do you also want to leave?" Peter answered, "Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life."

Where are you going to go? Who else is offering you the Bread of Life? Who else is giving you Christ Himself, body and blood, soul and divinity, under the humble appearances of bread and wine?

The Catholic Church is offering you Jesus—not a memory of Jesus, not a symbol of Jesus, but Jesus Himself. The question is: Will you receive Him?

A Word to Catholics

And if you're Catholic, let me give you a hard truth: Many of y'all are receiving Jesus in the Eucharist every Sunday without really believing He's there. You go up to Communion out of habit, out of obligation, because everybody else is going. But you don't genuflect with reverence. You don't examine your conscience before receiving. You don't spend time in Eucharistic adoration.

A recent survey showed that most Catholics don't actually believe in the Real Presence anymore. They think it's just a symbol, like the Protestants do. That's a crisis. That's a tragedy. That's the smoke of Satan seeping into the Church.

If you're Catholic and you don't believe in the Real Presence, you need to figure out what you do believe and why. Because if the Church is wrong about the Eucharist—if it's just a symbol—then the Church has been wrong about the most important thing for two thousand years. And if the Church is wrong about that, why believe anything she teaches?

But if the Church is right—if Jesus really is present in the Eucharist—then you better start treating Him with the reverence He deserves. You better start preparing your soul before you receive Him. You better start spending time with Him in adoration.

The Eucharist ain't your right. It's God's gift. Treat it that way.

The Stakes Couldn't Be Higher

What you believe about the Eucharist matters. It matters for your spiritual life. It matters for your relationship with God. It matters for your eternal destiny.

You're either receiving the Bread of Life that Jesus promised would raise you up on the last day, or you're going through religious motions that mean nothing.

You're either encountering Christ Himself, substantially present, or you're playing church with symbols and memories.

You're either standing at the foot of the Cross, present at Calvary through the sacrifice of the Mass, or you're attending a community gathering where people think nice thoughts about Jesus.

This is the fork in the road. This is where the sheep separate from the goats. This is where you decide: Do I believe what Jesus said? Do I believe what the Church has always taught? Or do I go my own way, making up my own version of Christianity that suits my modern sensibilities?

The Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist ain't a Catholic invention. It's not a medieval addition. It's not some superstitious holdover from primitive times.

It's the faith once delivered to the saints. It's what the apostles taught. It's what Christians have believed from the beginning. It's what Jesus promised and what He continues to give us.

The question ain't whether the Church is right. The question is whether you're willing to accept the truth.

And the truth is this: In every Catholic church, in every tabernacle, Jesus Christ is present—body, blood, soul, and divinity. He's waiting for you. He's offering Himself to you as the Bread of Life.

Will you believe Him? Will you receive Him? Or will you walk away like so many others, saying, "This saying is hard; who can accept it?"

The choice is yours. But make no mistake—it's a choice that matters eternally.

Because what you believe about Communion ain't just theology. It's the difference between eternal life and eternal death. It's the difference between encountering the Living God and settling for religious make-believe. It's the difference between receiving Christ and rejecting Him.

Jesus said it plain in John 6: "Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you."

No life. Not less life. Not compromised life. No life at all.

That's as clear as it gets. That's as serious as it gets. That's why what you believe about the Eucharist matters eternally.

So believe. Believe what Jesus said. Believe what the Church teaches. Believe what Christians have always believed.

And receive Him. Receive the Bread of Life. Receive Jesus Christ, truly present, truly offered, truly given for your salvation.

Because He's not just a symbol. He's not just a memory. He's the Living God, and He's offering Himself to you right now, today, in every Catholic church where the Eucharist is celebrated.

Don't walk away. Don't settle for less. Don't trade the reality for a symbol.

Receive Him. Believe in Him. And live forever.

That's the promise. That's the truth. That's what the Real Presence means.

And it matters eternally.

~by Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

© 2025 Texas Outlaw Press. All rights reserved.

https://texasoutlawpress.org