Why Your Bible Is Incomplete: The Books Protestants Threw Out and Catholics Kept by Jeff Callaway

Why Your Bible Is Incomplete: The Books Protestants Threw Out and Catholics Kept

by Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

Picture this moment. A Catholic grandmother opens her worn Bible at Sunday Mass. The lector announces the first reading from the Book of Wisdom. She follows along, her finger tracing words about righteousness and the souls of the just being in the hand of God. Across town, her Protestant grandson sits in his contemporary worship service. When the pastor references that same passage, the young man flips through his Bible, confused. The page numbers jump from Proverbs straight to Isaiah. Wisdom simply does not exist in his Scripture.

This is not a printing error. This is not denominational politics playing out in the margins. This is the stark reality that Catholics and Protestants do not read the same Bible, and most believers have no earthly idea why.

The question burns hotter than a Texas summer: Whose Bible is right? Who decided what belongs in Sacred Scripture? And if these books were good enough for fifteen centuries of Christianity, why did Martin Luther and his reforming band decide they had to go?

Buckle up, friend. We are about to take a ride through Church history that will challenge everything you thought you knew about the Word of God.

The Books That Divide Us

Let me lay it out plain. The Catholic Bible contains forty-six books in the Old Testament. Most Protestant Bibles contain thirty-nine. That seven-book difference represents an entire section of Scripture that one billion Catholics worldwide accept as the inspired Word of God, while most Protestants relegate these texts to a dusty appendix or cut them out entirely.

These books are called the deuterocanonical books, a fancy Greek term meaning "second canon." But that name is misleading as all get-out. These books were not added later. They were not some Catholic invention cooked up in smoke-filled rooms. They were part of the Christian Bible from the very beginning, and their removal is the real innovation in Church history.

The seven deuterocanonical books are Tobit, Judith, First Maccabees, Second Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch. Additionally, Catholics include expanded versions of Esther and Daniel with passages not found in the Hebrew texts. These are not fringe writings discovered in some desert cave. These are books that shaped Christian theology, doctrine, and worship for over fifteen hundred years before anyone thought to question their place in Scripture.

When Christianity Spoke Greek: The Septuagint Story

Here is what most Protestant pastors will not tell you from the pulpit: Jesus and his apostles did not carry around Hebrew scrolls. They used the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures completed between 300 and 100 BC in Alexandria, Egypt. This translation was made for Greek-speaking Jews scattered throughout the Mediterranean world who could no longer read Hebrew.

The Septuagint included all seven deuterocanonical books right alongside Genesis, Exodus, and Isaiah. There was no separate section, no asterisk noting these as lesser Scripture. They were woven into the fabric of the Old Testament that every Greek-speaking Jew and early Christian knew and used.

When the New Testament writers quoted the Old Testament, they quoted from the Septuagint more than three hundred times. The apostles preached from this Bible. The early Church fathers taught from this Bible. The first Christian communities worshiped using this Bible. The deuterocanonical books were not some controversial addition; they were simply part of the Scripture that the Church used from day one.

The Protestant historian J.N.D. Kelly, no friend to Catholic distinctives, admitted this reality plainly. He wrote that the Old Testament accepted as authoritative in the early Church was more comprehensive than the Protestant canon and always included the deuterocanonical books. This was not a Catholic conspiracy. This was historical fact.

The Church Councils That Settled the Matter

Now here is where it gets interesting. Some folks claim the Catholic Church added these books at the Council of Trent in 1546 as a response to the Protestant Reformation. That claim is not just wrong; it is backwards.

The canon of Scripture was definitively listed at the Council of Rome in 382 AD under Pope Damasus I. That list included forty-six Old Testament books with the deuterocanonicals right there in the middle. This decision was ratified at the Council of Hippo in 393 AD and the Council of Carthage in 397 AD and again in 419 AD. These were the same councils that gave us the twenty-seven books of the New Testament.

Let that sink in. The same Church authority that told you Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John belong in your Bible also told you that Tobit, Judith, and Maccabees belong there too. You cannot cherry-pick Church councils. Either the Church had authority to discern the canon or it did not. If it did not have that authority, then you have no grounds for accepting the New Testament either.

The Council of Florence in 1442 reaffirmed the complete canon. And yes, the Council of Trent in 1546 defended these books again, but Trent was not adding anything new. Trent was defending what had been Christian belief and practice for twelve centuries against the Protestant attempt to truncate Scripture.

What These Books Actually Teach

Let me introduce you to these books that Protestants threw out, because they contain some of the most powerful spiritual teaching in all of Scripture.

Tobit: When God Sends Angels

The Book of Tobit tells the story of a righteous man who loses everything. Tobit goes blind, loses his wealth, and suffers mockery from his own family. Simultaneously, a young woman named Sarah has watched seven husbands die on their wedding nights, killed by a demon before the marriages could be consummated. Both Tobit and Sarah pray for death, unable to bear their sufferings any longer.

God hears their prayers and sends the archangel Raphael in human disguise to heal them both. Raphael guides Tobit's son Tobiah on a journey where he catches a fish whose organs have healing properties. Tobiah marries Sarah, uses the fish to drive away the demon, and returns home to heal his father's blindness.

This book teaches the reality of angelic ministry in the lives of believers. It shows God's providence working through ordinary circumstances to accomplish extraordinary redemption. It emphasizes the purity of marriage, the power of prayer, the importance of almsgiving, and reverence for the dead. Tobit offers hope to those suffering unjustly and demonstrates that God never abandons his faithful ones, even in their darkest hours.

Judith: A Widow Who Saved Israel

The Book of Judith recounts how a beautiful and devout widow saved the entire nation of Israel from destruction. When the Assyrian general Holofernes besieged her city, Judith dressed in her finest clothes, went into the enemy camp, and used her wits and her faith to decapitate the general and scatter his army.

Judith is a story of courage, faith, and trusting God over human military might. This righteous woman prefigures the spiritual warfare imagery that runs throughout the New Testament. She shows that God does not need armies and chariots; he needs faithful hearts willing to act boldly for his glory.

Wisdom and Sirach: The Voice of God in Daily Life

The Books of Wisdom and Sirach are collections of moral wisdom and theological reflection that rival Proverbs and Ecclesiastes. Wisdom speaks about the immortality of the soul, the suffering of the righteous, and how God tests his people. Its language about righteousness and judgment echoes throughout the Gospels and Paul's letters.

Sirach, also known as Ecclesiasticus, provides practical guidance for living a covenantal life. It addresses friendship, humility, speech, wealth, family relationships, and the fear of God. Its teachings on almsgiving, caring for the poor, and moral integrity formed the ethical backbone of Jewish and Christian communities.

These books are not mere human philosophy. They are divinely inspired wisdom literature that illuminates the path of righteousness and reveals God's character to his people.

First and Second Maccabees: Martyrs Who Would Not Bow

The Books of Maccabees chronicle the heroic Jewish revolt against the Greek tyrant Antiochus Epiphanes, who tried to force God's people to abandon their faith. When Antiochus desecrated the Temple and outlawed Jewish worship, a family led by Judas Maccabeus rose up in armed resistance to defend the covenant.

These books record some of the most inspiring stories of martyrdom in all of Scripture. Elderly men choosing death over eating pork. A mother watching her seven sons tortured and killed one by one for refusing to violate God's law. These martyrs went to their deaths praising God and expressing firm belief in the resurrection of the dead.

But here is where it gets really uncomfortable for Protestants. Second Maccabees chapter twelve describes Judas Maccabeus collecting money to offer sacrifices in Jerusalem for soldiers who had died in battle. The text explicitly states that Judas acted nobly, believing in the resurrection and praying that the dead might be delivered from their sin.

This passage provides clear biblical evidence for praying for the dead and the existence of a state of purification after death - what Catholics call purgatory. No wonder Martin Luther wanted this book out of his Bible. It directly contradicted his theology of salvation by faith alone and his rejection of purgatory.

Baruch: The Prophet's Call to Repentance

The Book of Baruch contains prayers and prophecies attributed to Jeremiah's scribe. It calls the exiled people to repentance and offers hope for restoration. Baruch emphasizes that suffering comes from abandoning God's law and that return to covenant faithfulness brings redemption.

The additions to Esther and Daniel expand those narratives with prayers and songs that deepen our understanding of God's deliverance. The Prayer of Azariah and the Song of the Three Young Men show faithful worship in the midst of a fiery furnace. The stories of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon demonstrate Daniel's wisdom and God's vindication of the innocent.

The Protestant Removal: Why Luther Did What He Did

So why did Martin Luther place these books in an appendix of his German Bible in 1534, labeled as useful but not equal to Scripture? Why did later Protestant editions drop them entirely?

The answer is not pretty, and it reveals how theological agenda can trump historical Christianity.

Luther rejected the deuterocanonical books primarily because they were not in the Hebrew Masoretic Text. He appealed to the Hebrew canon that Palestinian rabbis had settled around 90 AD at Jamnia. But here is the kicker: those rabbis were making decisions about the Jewish canon generations after Christianity had already spread throughout the world using the Septuagint. The rabbis at Jamnia were not defining the Christian Old Testament; they were defining what books Jews would use after they had rejected Jesus as Messiah.

Luther and the reformers essentially accepted the biblical authority of rabbis who denied Christ over the authority of the Christian Church that had used these books for fifteen centuries.

But there is a deeper reason Luther wanted these books gone, and it is not about Hebrew manuscripts. It is about doctrine. Second Maccabees supports prayer for the dead. Tobit emphasizes almsgiving and good works. Wisdom speaks of the immortality of the soul and an intermediate state after death. All of these teachings contradicted the new Protestant theology Luther was constructing.

Luther was honest about this. He called Second Maccabees one of the books he wished had never come to us because it contained too many things that offended his theological sensibilities. In other words, Luther removed books from the Bible because they taught Catholic doctrine he did not like.

Think about that. A sixteenth-century German monk decided he knew better than the councils of Hippo, Carthage, Florence, and fifteen centuries of Christian tradition. He determined that books the Church had always accepted as Scripture were suddenly not Scripture because they contradicted his new theology.

That is not recovering ancient Christianity. That is innovation dressed up as reform.

The Council of Trent: Defending the Ancient Faith

When the Catholic Church responded to Luther's Bible-trimming at the Council of Trent in 1546, it was not adding anything new. The Council formally declared what the Church had believed and practiced from the beginning: these books are fully canonical, divinely inspired Scripture.

The vote at Trent was not unanimous. Twenty-four bishops voted for the complete canon, fifteen voted against, and sixteen abstained. This shows there was legitimate discussion and discernment happening. But the majority prevailed, guided by the Holy Spirit, defending the Bible that Christians had used since apostolic times.

Trent's decree stated clearly that anyone who did not accept these books as sacred and canonical was anathema. Strong language, yes. But the Church was defending the integrity of Scripture itself against those who would carve it up based on personal theological preferences.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church affirms this teaching today, citing these deuterocanonical books throughout its exposition of Catholic doctrine and morals. They are not second-class Scripture. They are the Word of God, period.

Answering Protestant Objections

Let me address the common Protestant objections head-on, because they need answering.

Objection One: Jesus never quoted these books, so they cannot be Scripture.

Response: Jesus never quoted Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, or several other books that Protestants accept as canonical either. Absence of direct quotation does not equal absence of inspiration. The early Church used the Septuagint, which included these books, and there are numerous allusions to them throughout the New Testament. The standard for canonicity is not whether Jesus quoted a book directly but whether the Church received it as inspired Scripture.

Objection Two: These books are not in the Hebrew Bible, so they do not belong in the Christian Old Testament.

Response: The Church's authority to discern the canon predates the Jewish rabbinical decisions at Jamnia by decades. Christians are not bound by post-Christian Jewish determinations about which books to exclude. The apostles and early Christians used the Septuagint, not the Hebrew canon that was finalized after they were dead. We follow the Bible that the apostles used, not the Bible that rabbis who rejected Christ assembled.

Objection Three: These books teach Catholic doctrine like purgatory and prayers for the dead.

Response: Yes, they do. And that is exactly the point. These doctrines were part of biblical Christianity from the beginning. The fact that these books teach Catholic doctrine is evidence that Catholic doctrine is biblical, not evidence that the books are uninspired. Protestants removed the books because they contradicted Protestant theology, not because they were historically or theologically suspect.

The Evidence for Catholic Teaching

Here is what Protestants do not want to admit: the deuterocanonical books provide explicit scriptural support for distinctly Catholic teachings that Protestant theology rejects.

Second Maccabees twelve, verses forty-three through forty-six, is the clearest Old Testament witness to purgatory and the efficacy of prayers for the dead. After soldiers died wearing idolatrous amulets, Judas Maccabeus collected money to offer sacrifice for their sins. The text calls this action noble and holy, done in hope of the resurrection, so that the dead might be delivered from their sin.

This is not allegorical. This is not symbolic. This is a historical account of Jews offering prayers and sacrifices for the dead, believing such actions could help those who had died. The practice predates Christianity, showing it was part of Jewish belief about the afterlife. The Church continued this practice because it was already biblical.

Tobit emphasizes almsgiving and good works as expressions of righteousness. It teaches that prayer and fasting and almsgiving deliver from death and cleanse away all sin. This contradicts the Protestant doctrine of salvation by faith alone, which is why Luther wanted it gone.

Wisdom speaks of the immortality of the soul and the testing of the righteous through suffering. It describes how the souls of the just are in the hand of God, at peace even when they appear to have been destroyed. This teaching informed early Christian understanding of death, judgment, and eternal life.

The theological richness of these books cannot be overstated. They bridge the Old and New Testaments, filling the four-hundred-year intertestamental period with prophetic hope and faithful witness. They show how God prepared his people for the coming of the Messiah.

The Historical Verdict

Here is what cannot be disputed: the Christian Church used these books as Scripture from its earliest days. The councils that gave us the New Testament gave us these Old Testament books too. The Bible that shaped Christian theology, liturgy, and spirituality for fifteen centuries included these texts.

Martin Luther did not recover the ancient canon. He truncated it. He removed books that had been Christian Scripture longer than the United States has been a nation. He did so based on rabbinic decisions made after the apostles were dead and because the books taught doctrine he did not like.

The first complete Bible ever printed, the Gutenberg Bible in 1455, included these books. The King James Version of 1611 included these books in a separate Apocrypha section. Luther's German Bible of 1534 included them with a warning label. It was not until 1825 that the British and Foreign Bible Society started printing Protestant Bibles without them entirely.

For three centuries after the Reformation, Protestant Bibles still contained these texts. The complete removal is a modern innovation, not an ancient tradition.

What This Means for You Today

If you are Catholic, embrace the fullness of Scripture you possess. Read Tobit and Judith and Maccabees. Study the wisdom of Sirach. Let these books deepen your faith and inform your understanding of God's covenant faithfulness. They are not optional. They are the Word of God.

If you are Protestant, I challenge you to ask hard questions. Why do you accept the Church's authority to discern the New Testament canon but reject its authority regarding the Old Testament? Why do you follow Jewish rabbis who rejected Christ over the Christian tradition that spans back to the apostles? Why has your Bible been shrinking instead of staying faithful to what Christians have always read?

Do not settle for a truncated Bible. Do not accept the excuse that these books are deuterocanonical and therefore lesser. The Church that gave you the Gospels gave you these books too. If you trust the Church's judgment on one, logic demands you trust its judgment on the other.

The Call to Fullness

Your Bible is not incomplete because the Catholic Church added books. Your Bible is incomplete if Protestant reformers removed books that were always there.

The deuterocanonical books stand as a witness to two thousand years of Christian faith. They contain prophecy and wisdom, history and prayer, martyrdom and hope. They teach us how to live faithfully in exile, how to trust God through suffering, how to pray for those who have died, and how to fight spiritual battles with courage and conviction.

These books illuminate doctrine that Protestant theology obscures. They provide biblical evidence for teachings that shaped Christianity long before anyone heard of Martin Luther. They connect us to the faith of the martyrs, the witness of the early Church, and the ongoing work of the Holy Spirit preserving truth through the ages.

Read them. Study them. Let them challenge your assumptions about what Scripture is and who decides what belongs in it. The Holy Spirit guided the Church in discerning the canon, and that guidance produced a Bible with forty-six Old Testament books, not thirty-nine.

The choice before you is simple: accept the Bible the Church has always used, or accept the truncated version created by men who rejected the Church's authority. Choose the fullness of Scripture, or settle for less.

As for me and my house, we will read all of God's Word. Every last inspired book. Because when Christ said he came to fulfill the Law and the Prophets, he was reading from the Septuagint that included these texts. When the apostles preached, they quoted from this fuller canon. When the martyrs died, they were sustained by the hope found in Maccabees.

The Word of God is not subject to human editing based on theological preference. It is not negotiable. It is not optional. It is complete, full, and sufficient.

And that completeness includes seven books that some folks wish would just go away. But truth does not disappear because it is inconvenient. Scripture does not shrink because it contradicts human theology. The Bible stands eternal, unchanged, complete.

So read your Bible. All of it. And when you get to Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, Baruch, and Maccabees, thank God that the Church preserved these treasures for you. Thank God that Catholic Christians never stopped reading them, never stopped believing them, never stopped defending them as the inspired Word of God.

Your Bible is only incomplete if you let reformers convince you that less is somehow more. But God's Word is abundant, overflowing, generous. The fullness of Scripture awaits those brave enough to read what the Church has always proclaimed: these books are Holy Scripture, inspired by God, useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness.

That is the truth. That is history. That is the Catholic faith once delivered to the saints.

Now go read your whole Bible.

~by Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

© 2026 Texas Outlaw Press. All rights reserved.

https://texasoutlawpress.org