The Miracle of the Sun: 70,000 Witnesses to the Impossible by Jeff Callaway

The Miracle of the Sun: 70,000 Witnesses to the Impossible

By Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

Rain hammered the Portuguese countryside like divine judgment on October 13, 1917. Seventy thousand souls stood in mud thick as mortar, their clothes soaked through to bone, eyes turned toward gray clouds that refused to break. They had come from every corner of a nation torn between faith and fury, believers and blasphemers shoulder to shoulder in a field outside Fatima, all waiting for three shepherd children to be proven either prophets or frauds.

World War I was devouring Europe's sons in trenches filled with poison gas and rotting corpses. Portugal's government, drunk on secularism and Masonic ideology, had spent the better part of a decade trying to strangle the Catholic Church like Herod slaughtering innocents. Churches shuttered. Priests exiled. Faith driven underground like contraband. This was the world into which Heaven chose to speak.

And Heaven did not whisper.

The Children Who Saw What Others Could Not

The story begins in spring 1917, when three peasant children tending sheep near the hamlet of Aljustrel witnessed what they claimed was the Virgin Mary appearing above a small holm oak tree. Lucia dos Santos, age ten, along with her younger cousins Francisco and Jacinta Marto, ages nine and seven, became the unlikely recipients of messages that would shake Portugal to its foundations.

These were not educated theologians or well-connected aristocrats. They were barefoot children who could barely read, spending their days with sheep and prayer, living in poverty that most modern Americans cannot fathom. Yet they stood before hostile interrogators, government officials who threatened them with boiling oil and death, and never once wavered in their testimony.

The Lady told them to return on the thirteenth day of each month through October. She promised that on that final meeting, she would perform a miracle so that all would believe. Word spread like wildfire through a nation starving for hope. By July, thousands were making pilgrimage to the Cova da Iria. By October, the crowd had swelled beyond counting.

The children described Our Lady's messages with consistent detail across hundreds of interrogations. She called for prayer, penance, and the daily recitation of the Rosary for peace and the conversion of sinners. She warned of future chastisements if humanity did not turn from sin. She showed the children a terrifying vision of Hell, where souls fall like sparks from a great fire. She prophesied a second world war if her requests were ignored.

But on October 13, she promised something more than words. She promised a sign that would silence every skeptic, confound every cynic, and demonstrate that Heaven still had business with Earth.

The Gathering Storm

Three days of torrential rain preceded October 13. The roads turned to rivers of mud. Wagons sank to their axles. Yet still they came, trudging through conditions that would have stopped any sensible person from leaving home.

They came by foot, by donkey cart, by automobile for those wealthy enough to afford such modern contraptions. Families carried sick children hoping for healing. Old women clutched rosaries worn smooth by decades of prayer. Young men recently returned from the trenches, haunted by horrors they could never speak aloud, searched for meaning in a world gone mad.

And they came to mock.

Avelino de Almeida, editor of O Século, Portugal's largest anticlerical newspaper, arrived with his pen sharpened for satire. A devoted Freemason and agnostic, he had written scathing articles ridiculing the "fanaticism" of those who believed three peasant children. He came to document the collapse of this religious delusion, to watch faith embarrass itself on the stage of public scrutiny.

Dr. José Maria de Almeida Garrett, professor of sciences at Coimbra University, brought the cold eye of academic skepticism. Numerous journalists from secular papers positioned themselves to chronicle the certain disappointment. Government officials stood ready to arrest the children for disturbing public order.

The morning rain intensified. By midday, the Cova da Iria had become a quagmire. Seventy thousand people, perhaps more, stood drenched and shivering. Some prayed. Some cursed. Some simply waited, watching the children who claimed to see and hear what no one else could perceive.

Noon in Fatima

At approximately half past one, something shifted in the atmosphere. Lucia, who alone among the three children could speak with the apparition, suddenly called out for the crowd to look at the sun. The rain stopped as if a faucet had been turned off. The heavy cloud cover that had oppressed the sky for three days tore apart like a veil being ripped.

What happened next defies every law of physics that governs our ordered cosmos.

The sun appeared through the break in clouds, but not as the sun appears on any ordinary day. Witnesses described it as a silver disc, flat and luminous, that could be gazed upon directly without pain or damage to the eyes. Then it began to move.

Dr. Garrett, the skeptical scientist, would later write in calm, measured language about an event that shook his understanding of natural law. He described the sun appearing as a glazed wheel of mother-of-pearl, clear-cut with a well-defined rim, giving off light and heat yet not burning the eyes of those who stared directly at it.

The disc began to rotate. Witnesses reported it spinning like a Catherine wheel, casting brilliant colors across the landscape. Everything took on shifting hues: blue like light through cathedral stained glass, then yellow, then violet, then shades never seen in nature. Trees, earth, clothing, human faces all reflected these impossible colors.

Then the sun appeared to detach itself from the heavens and plunge toward the earth.

Terror and Wonder

Avelino de Almeida, the Masonic journalist who came to mock, found himself writing words he never expected to pen. In O Século's October 15 edition, he described an incredible spectacle, unbelievable if you had not witnessed it. He wrote of the immense crowd turning toward the sun, which appeared at its zenith clear of clouds, looking like a plate of dull silver that could be stared at without discomfort. He documented the tremendous cry that rang out as the masses shouted about miracle and marvel.

The testimony did not come only from believers hoping to see their faith confirmed. Domingos Pinto Coelho, writing for the newspaper Ordem, described the sun surrounded by scarlet flame, then aureoled in yellow and deep purple, seeming to be in exceeding fast and whirling movement, appearing to be loosened from the sky and approaching the earth while strongly radiating heat.

O Dia, another Lisbon daily, published a special reporter's account describing the silver sun enveloped in gauzy gray light, whirling and turning in a circle of broken clouds. The light turned beautiful blue as if it had come through cathedral windows, spreading over the people who knelt with outstretched hands. Then the blue faded to yellow, casting yellow stains against white handkerchiefs and dark skirts, repeating on trees and stones.

The phenomenon was witnessed not only at the Cova da Iria but miles away. Father Ignacio Lourenco, then a nine-year-old schoolboy eleven miles distant, saw the miracle from his village. He described looking fixedly at the sun, which seemed pale and did not hurt his eyes, appearing like a ball of snow revolving on itself before suddenly seeming to come down in a zigzag, menacing the earth. Terrified, he ran to hide among people who were weeping and expecting the end of the world.

Afonso Lopes Vieira, a Portuguese poet, observed the phenomenon from his veranda. He had not been thinking of the children's predictions but was enchanted by a remarkable spectacle in the sky of a kind he had never seen before.

Reports came from as far as twenty-five miles away. The miracle was public, undeniable, witnessed by believers and atheists, the faithful and the hostile, those who came hoping and those who came to disprove.

The Immediate Aftermath

When the sun returned to its normal position after approximately ten minutes, something else remarkable had occurred. The mud-soaked ground was dry. Clothes that had been drenched through were completely dry. Witnesses testified to this physical change that seemed to defy natural explanation as thoroughly as the solar phenomenon itself.

Ti Marto, father of Francisco and Jacinta, described how extraordinary it was that the sun did not hurt their eyes. He spoke of the terrible moment when the sun appeared to detach itself from its place and fall toward them.

Maria de Capelinha, who would later become custodian of the original chapel built at the site, described how everything turned different colors: yellow, blue, white. The sun shook and trembled.

An unbeliever who had spent the morning mocking those who went to Fatima to see an ordinary girl stood paralyzed, eyes fixed on the sun. Father Lourenco later recalled how this scoffer trembled from head to foot, lifting his arms and falling on his knees in the mud, crying out to Our Lady.

Old men with white beards challenged atheists aloud, demanding they say whether something supernatural had occurred. The crowd that had gathered in skepticism and rain now knelt in mud transformed to dry earth, weeping and praising God.

What the Church Teaches About Private Revelation

The Catholic Church, in her wisdom spanning two millennia, carefully distinguishes between public and private revelation. This distinction matters profoundly for understanding what Fatima means and what it demands of us.

Public Revelation, given through Scripture and Sacred Tradition, ended with the death of the last Apostle. This is the deposit of faith, complete and unchanging, to which nothing can be added. It is binding on all Catholics under pain of separation from the Church. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states clearly that the Christian economy, being the new and definitive Covenant, will never pass away, and no new public revelation is to be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Private revelations, even those approved by the Church, belong to a different category entirely. They do not improve or complete Christ's definitive Revelation but help us live more fully by it in a certain period of history. As the Catechism teaches in paragraph 67, the Church's Magisterium guides the sensus fidelium to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or His saints to the Church.

No Catholic is obligated to believe in any private revelation, even one approved by Church authority. The assent we give to approved apparitions is human faith based on credible evidence, not supernatural faith demanded by divine authority. Pope Benedict XIV, writing in the 1700s, observed that the Church accepts these revelations only as probable, and anyone may give no heed to them without injury to the Catholic faith, provided they do so modestly, not without reason, and without contempt.

The Bishop of Leiria-Fatima, after years of careful investigation, declared the Fatima apparitions worthy of belief in October 1930. He issued a decree of constat de supernaturalitate, meaning the supernatural character of the events was established with moral certainty. This was not infallible teaching but a prudent judgment that the faithful could safely embrace these revelations and the devotions associated with them.

The recognition came after exhaustive investigation. Testimony was collected from thousands of witnesses. The children were interrogated repeatedly, sometimes by hostile authorities. Medical experts examined claims of miraculous healings. Theologians scrutinized the messages for any hint of doctrinal error. The process took thirteen years of careful scrutiny.

What the Church approved was not merely the children's sincerity but the supernatural character of the apparitions themselves and the extraordinary sign given on October 13, 1917. The investigation found no natural explanation adequate to account for what seventy thousand witnesses reported seeing.

The Scientific Scramble

Skeptics have spent more than a century attempting to explain away what happened in Fatima without recourse to the supernatural. Their efforts reveal more about the limits of materialism than about the miracle itself.

One popular theory suggests stratospheric dust altered the sun's appearance, making it easy to look at and causing it to appear in various colors. Steuart Campbell proposed this in the Journal of Meteorology, pointing to documented cases of unusual solar appearances in other times and places.

The theory crumbles under examination. Dust clouds do not appear on command at a precise time predicted months in advance by illiterate children. They do not confine their effects to a specific geographic area while leaving the rest of the world untouched. They do not cause the sun to perform coordinated movements witnessed by tens of thousands from multiple vantage points.

Joe Nickell, a professional skeptic, suggested the phenomenon was a sundog, an atmospheric optical effect caused by ice crystals in high clouds. He further proposed that witnesses experienced retinal distortion from staring at the sun, creating afterimages that seemed to move as people turned their heads.

This explanation requires believing that seventy thousand people all simultaneously suffered identical retinal damage that produced identical hallucinations of movement and color change. It requires believing that seasoned journalists, university professors, and simple farmers all mistook optical illusions for reality in exactly the same way. It requires believing that people eleven miles away, not even thinking about Fatima, experienced the same mass delusion at precisely the predicted moment.

The mass hallucination theory deserves special mention for its absurdity. This hypothesis asks us to believe that believers and skeptics, children and adults, those present at the Cova and those miles distant, all experienced identical visions because they expected to see something unusual.

Setting aside the psychological impossibility of tens of thousands of people hallucinating identical details, this theory cannot explain the sudden drying of rain-soaked ground and clothing. Hallucinations do not evaporate water. They do not change physical conditions observable to touch and measurement.

Professor Auguste Meessen proposed that unusual atmospheric conditions, enhanced by meteorological factors, created the optical effects. But as Father Stanley Jaki noted, even if we grant that natural factors played a role, the careful coordination of so many physical elements occurring at the exact predicted time would itself constitute a miracle. God often works through natural means, elevating and enhancing them to serve His purposes.

The fundamental problem with all naturalistic explanations is timing. The children predicted, months in advance, that a miracle would occur on October 13 at a specific location at a specific time. Atmospheric dust, sundogs, meteorological anomalies, and optical illusions do not obey the prophecies of shepherd children. They do not manifest on schedule to vindicate religious claims.

The Witness of Hostile Sources

The most compelling testimony comes from those who came to disprove, not to believe.

Avelino de Almeida's transformation is particularly striking. This Freemason and anticlerical editor, whose newspaper existed largely to attack the Church, found himself compelled by what he witnessed to write accounts that bordered on wonder. His October 15 article, published two days after the event, reads like a man struggling to reconcile what his worldview told him should be impossible with what his eyes forced him to acknowledge.

He wrote of the sun trembling and making sudden incredible movements outside all cosmic laws. He described the biblical aspect of the crowd standing bareheaded, eagerly searching the sky. He documented the tremendous cry of miracle and marvel. He reported on free thinkers and persons not overly concerned with religious matters being naturally impressed by what they saw.

This was not a man predisposed to religious enthusiasm. This was a man whose professional reputation and ideological commitments should have led him to ridicule what occurred. Instead, he bore witness to the impossible, using careful, measured language to describe an event that shattered the materialist framework within which he operated.

Dr. Garrett provided even more detailed scientific testimony. He described the phenomenon with the precision of an academic trained to observe and document. He noted specific colors: amethyst, purple, shades that bathed the entire landscape. He described testing whether his vision was damaged by turning away, closing his eyes, and verifying that the colors remained consistent regardless of where he looked.

He noted that the sun gave light and heat but did not hurt the eyes, appearing with a sharp, well-defined edge like a large disc. He described the sun appearing to whirl and move in ways that violated cosmic laws. He stated clearly that he had never, before or after October 13, observed similar atmospheric or solar phenomena.

This was a man with everything to lose professionally by endorsing supernatural claims. Portuguese academia in 1917 was as hostile to religious explanations as American universities are today. Yet Dr. Garrett put his reputation on the line to testify truthfully about what he witnessed.

The consistency of testimony across ideological divides is perhaps the most telling evidence. Believers saw what skeptics saw. Catholics witnessed what anticlericals witnessed. The uneducated described the same phenomenon as university professors. This was not subjective religious experience subject to interpretation. This was an objective event observable to anyone present, regardless of their interior dispositions.

The Message Behind the Miracle

The miracle of the sun did not occur in isolation. It came as authentication for a message that Heaven was delivering through three children.

Our Lady's words at Fatima cut to the heart of what ails our modern world. She called for daily recitation of the Rosary for peace and the conversion of sinners. She emphasized devotion to her Immaculate Heart. She showed the children a vision of Hell to remind humanity that eternal consequences follow from temporal choices.

She warned that if her requests were ignored, a worse war than the one then raging would erupt in the next pontificate. This prophecy, given in 1917, came to fulfillment with terrifying precision when World War II began in 1939 during the reign of Pope Pius XII. She predicted the spread of Russia's errors throughout the world if that nation were not consecrated to her Immaculate Heart. The rise of Soviet Communism, which would murder over one hundred million people and enslave half the world, validated her warning.

The Fatima message is not complex theology requiring advanced degrees to comprehend. It is the simple, urgent call to turn from sin and turn toward God. Pray. Do penance. Make reparation for the offenses committed against the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate Heart of Mary. Stop offending the Lord our God, who is already so much offended.

These are not comfortable messages for a culture drunk on license and calling it freedom. They do not accommodate our desire to maintain our sins while claiming heaven's blessing. They demand repentance, that word modern ears refuse to hear.

The miracle authenticated the message. Heaven broke through the barrier between natural and supernatural to demonstrate that these words carried divine authority. The sun danced to prove that Our Lady truly spoke, that her warnings deserved hearing, that the children told the truth.

Why Seventy Thousand Witnesses Matter

We live in an age of deep skepticism, where claims of supernatural intervention are dismissed as primitive superstition or psychological delusion. We are told that miracles violate the laws of nature and therefore cannot occur. We are assured that all religious experience can be explained through neurology, sociology, or mass psychology.

Fatima shatters these comfortable certainties.

This was not a private vision experienced by a single mystic in a monastery cell, subject to the interpretation of an isolated individual's interior experience. This was a public miracle witnessed by tens of thousands, documented by hostile journalists, described in consistent detail by people across the full spectrum of belief and unbelief.

You cannot dismiss seventy thousand witnesses as delusional without calling into question every form of historical evidence and eyewitness testimony. If we cannot trust the convergent testimony of masses of people describing what they saw with their own eyes, then we cannot trust anything about history. The murder of Julius Caesar becomes uncertain. The signing of the Declaration of Independence becomes questionable. Every major event in human history that we did not personally witness must be doubted.

The presence of skeptics and hostile witnesses strengthens rather than weakens the testimony. If only believers had witnessed the miracle, critics could claim confirmation bias. But when Freemasons and anticlericals, government officials hoping to expose fraud, and university professors trained in scientific skepticism all report seeing the same impossible event, the testimony carries extraordinary weight.

The geographic distribution of witnesses matters too. This was not confined to the immediate area of the Cova da Iria where psychological contagion might be invoked as explanation. People eleven miles away, twenty-five miles away, people who were not even thinking about Fatima or the predicted miracle, witnessed the solar phenomenon. They could not have been influenced by crowd psychology or religious fervor because they were not part of the crowd and harbored no particular expectations.

The documentation by secular newspapers provides another layer of credibility. These were not Catholic publications eager to promote Church teachings. O Século existed largely to attack the Church and promote secularist ideology. Yet its pages carried detailed accounts of a miracle that validated everything the editors opposed.

The Scandal of Divine Intervention

The greatest resistance to accepting Fatima comes not from inadequate evidence but from philosophical commitments that require denying any evidence, no matter how strong.

If you believe that the material world is all that exists, that consciousness is merely neurons firing, that meaning and purpose are illusions evolution tricked us into perceiving, then Fatima must be explained away. It must be, because accepting it would require abandoning your entire worldview.

If you believe that God, should He exist, set the universe in motion and then stepped back to let it run according to fixed laws without intervention, then Fatima becomes impossible by definition. Miracles cannot occur not because the evidence is lacking but because the philosophical system has no room for them.

If you believe that all religions are equally valid expressions of human spirituality, that no particular tradition has access to objective truth about the divine, then Fatima presents a scandal. It suggests that Heaven has preferences, that Catholic teaching about the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Rosary and penance carries divine endorsement, that not all paths lead to the same destination.

These are not arguments about evidence. They are arguments about prior commitments that no amount of evidence can overcome. Show a convinced materialist ten million witnesses to a miracle and he will construct increasingly elaborate theories about mass delusion rather than abandon his conviction that matter is all that matters.

This is why Jesus said that if they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead. Some forms of unbelief are invincible because they serve purposes deeper than mere assessment of evidence.

The Children's Witness

The children themselves provide powerful testimony through their lives and deaths.

Francisco died in 1919 at age ten, victim of the influenza pandemic that swept the world. Jacinta followed in 1920 at age nine, also taken by illness. Both endured their sufferings with supernatural patience, offering their pain for the conversion of sinners as Our Lady had requested. They spoke frequently of their desire to console Jesus and Mary for the offenses committed against them.

These were children who could have recanted their testimony at any point. They were threatened with boiling oil and death by government officials. They were mocked by neighbors and doubted by their own parents. They could have ended all persecution by simply admitting they had made it up or been mistaken.

They never wavered. Even unto death, they maintained the truth of what they had witnessed.

Francisco and Jacinta were canonized by Pope Francis in 2017, exactly one hundred years after the apparitions. Their recognition as saints provides the Church's ultimate endorsement of their holiness and truthfulness. The Church does not canonize liars or the deluded.

Lucia entered religious life and lived until 2005, dying at age ninety-seven. She spent decades writing detailed memoirs of the apparitions, providing consistent testimony across the years. She was declared Venerable by Pope Francis in 2023, moving her along the path to possible sainthood.

The children's lives, marked by profound holiness despite their poverty and lack of education, point to the authenticity of their experience. Encounters with the divine transform people. The fruits visible in these three lives testify to the reality of what they witnessed.

Fatima's Warning for Our Time

More than a century has passed since that October day when Heaven interrupted history. The warnings Our Lady gave have proven terrifyingly accurate. The worse war she predicted came. Russia's errors did spread throughout the world. Souls continue falling into Hell like snowflakes in a blizzard because no one prays or makes sacrifice for them.

The modern world staggers under the weight of sins the children could not have imagined. Abortion slaughters millions. Marriage and family have been redefined according to human whim rather than divine design. Churches stand empty while stadiums overflow. What was called perversion a generation ago is now celebrated as virtue, and those who maintain traditional Christian morality are persecuted as bigots.

We have done precisely what Our Lady warned against. We have offended the Lord our God beyond measure. We have rejected His commandments, mocked His Church, and lived as though Heaven's opinion matters not at all.

The message of Fatima remains as urgent today as in 1917. Perhaps more so. Prayer, penance, reparation, devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, daily recitation of the Rosary. These simple practices carry Heaven's endorsement, authenticated by a miracle witnessed by multitudes.

The alternative is further chastisement. Not because God delights in punishing but because sin carries natural consequences. A culture that murders its children will not endure. A civilization that celebrates sexual chaos will collapse. A people that rejects God will find themselves ruled by demons wearing human faces.

The Sun Still Stands

I have walked the fields of Fatima. I have stood where seventy thousand stood, watching pilgrims from every nation kneel in prayer before the basilica that now marks the spot where Heaven touched Earth. The children are buried there, Francisco and Jacinta in tombs that draw millions who seek their intercession.

The sun overhead shines with ordinary light now. No colors cascade across the landscape. No spiral motion threatens the earth. The cosmos operates according to the laws God established at creation.

But on October 13, 1917, those laws bowed to a higher authority. The Author of nature demonstrated His sovereignty over His own creation. The sun danced at His Mother's request, and seventy thousand witnesses testified to what cannot be but was.

You can believe the scientists who were there and saw what shattered their materialist assumptions. You can believe the skeptics who came to mock and left shaken. You can believe the journalists who reported what their ideology told them could not be true. You can believe the children who died rather than recant.

Or you can believe that seventy thousand people, including hostile witnesses with every reason to deny what they saw, all simultaneously experienced identical delusions that produced identical testimonies documented in secular newspapers and verified by scientific observers.

The choice reveals more about the chooser than about the evidence.

I believe the witnesses. I believe the children. I believe that on one October day in 1917, Heaven demonstrated its reality and its authority with a sign no honest person could deny.

The miracle authenticated the message. The message demands response. Prayer. Penance. Reparation. Conversion. These are not optional extras for the especially devout. They are Heaven's prescription for a world sick unto death with sin.

The sun danced over Fatima. It dances still in the sky of history, a permanent rebuke to those who claim Heaven keeps silent. God has spoken. Mary has appeared. The children told the truth.

The question that remains is what we will do with a miracle witnessed by multitudes, documented by enemies, and authenticated by the Church.

The sun danced. Will we?

~by Jeff Callaway

Texas Outlaw Poet

© 2026 Texas Outlaw Press. All rights reserved.

https://texasoutlawpress.org